Index > Vol. 41/2009 > Iss. 8/July > pp. 684-686 > Abstract
Short communication

Inpatient rehabilitation services for patients after stroke in Thailand: A multi-centre study

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0399

Abstract:

Objective: To set a baseline for measuring the development of medical rehabilitation services and outcomes for patients after stroke and promoting rehabilitation medicine in Thailand.
Design: Multi-centre, prospective study.
Subjects: Patients after stroke in Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry (TSRR), aged ≥ 18 years, with stable medical signs, able to follow a 1-step command and sit for at least 30 min.
Methods: Rehabilitation services were recorded daily as units of treatment (1 unit = 20 min). Length of stay and treatment costs were calculated.
Results: Of 327 patients enrolled in the study, 285 (87.2%) completed their treatment programme. Mean length of stay was 29.4 (standard deviation 17.9) days. The average number of total treatment units for stroke rehabilitation was 319.5 (range 27–1674 units), with 205 units of nursing, 40 units of physical therapy and 34 units of occupational therapy as the top 3 services provided. The mean total cost for all treatments during rehabilitation was 28,399 (standard deviation 22,511) baht (approximately USD 789). The ratio of costs not related to rehabilitation to those related to rehabilitation was approximately 2:1.
Conclusion: This study reports the baseline for measuring the development of rehabilitation services for patients after stroke with a mean length of stay of one month, and for estimating the reasonable costs.

Authors:

Vilai Kuptniratsaikul, Apichana Kovindha, Pornpimon Massakulpan, Wutichai Permsirivanich, Patcharawimol Srisa-an Kuptniratsaikul

Key words:

stroke, rehabilitation, health services, costs, multi-centre study, length of stay.

References

  1. Anderson C, Ni Mhurchu C, Brown PM, Carter K. Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide home-based care: an overview and cost analysis. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 537-552. Link to article
  2. Payne KA, Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ, Craig Green TJ, Klittich WS. Long term cost-of-illness in stroke: an international review. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 813-825. Link to article
  3. Indredavik B. Stroke units: the Norwegian experience. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15: 19-20.
  4. Quinn TJ, Paolucci S, Sunnerhagen KS, Sivenius J, Walker MF, Toni D, et al. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 99-111. Link to article
  5. Viriyavejakul A, Senanarong V, Prayoonwiwat N, Praditsuwan R, Chaisevikul R, Poungvarin N. Epidemiology of stroke in the elderly in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 1998; 81: 497-505.
  6. National Health Security Office. Progress and achievement annual report 2005: universal coverage of health care implementation in fiscal year 2005. Nonthaburi: National Health Security Office; 2005.
  7. Kuptniratsaikul V, Kovindha A, Massakulpan P, Piravej K, Suethanapornkul S, Dajpratham P, et al. An epidemiologic study of the Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry (TSRR): a multi-center study. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91: 225-233.
  8. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
  9. Kuptniratsaikul V, Kovindha A, Dajpratham P, Piravej K. Main outcomes of stroke rehabilitation: a multi-centre study in Thailand. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 54-58. Link to article
  10. Kuptniratsaikul V, Kovindha A, Suethanapornkul S, Manimmanakorn N, Archongka Y. Complications during the rehabilitation period in Thai patients with stroke: a multicenter prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 92-99. Link to article
  11. Fan CW, McDonnell R, Johnson Z, O-Keeffe S, Crowe MJ. Hospital-based stroke care in Ireland: results from one regional register. Ir J Med Sci 2000; 169: 30-33. Link to article
  12. Paciaroni M, Arnold P, Van Melle G, Bogousslavsky J. Severe disability at hospital discharge in ischemic stroke survivors. Eur Neurol 2000; 43: 30-34. Link to article
  13. Ko KF, Sheppard L. The contribution of a comprehensive stroke unit to the outcome of Chinese stroke patients. Singapore Med J 2006; 47: 208-212.
  14. Kuo YF, Ostir GV, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. Examination of follow-up therapy in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 192-200. Link to article
  15. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Heuschmann PU, Marschall D, Emmert M, Baltzer N, Neund��rfer B, et al. Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry: the Erlangen Stroke Project. Stroke 2006; 37: 1179-1183. Link to article
  16. Christensen MC, Munro V. Ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: the latest evidence on mortality, readmissions and hospital costs from Scotland. Neuroepidemiology 2008; 30: 239-246. Link to article
  17. Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Mihalopoulos C, Carter R, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, et al. Cost of stroke in Australia from a societal perspective: results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2001; 32: 2409-2416. Link to article
  18. Ter��nt A, Mark�� LA, Asplund K, Norrving B, Jonsson E, Wester PO. Costs of stroke in Sweden. A national perspective. Stroke 1994; 25: 2363-2369.