Index > Vol. 40/2008 > Iss. 3/March > pp. 195-199 > Abstract
 

Relationship between usual physical, cognitive and social activities and functional recovery at hospital discharge after acute stroke

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0149

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the relationship between lifestyle prior to the event and functional recovery at hospital discharge after acute stroke.
Design: Cohort study.
Patients: A sample of 191 patients with first stroke episode (87.4% ischaemic).
Methods: Severity of the event at admission was measured by the Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The Frenchay Activity Index was used to evaluate the patients’ previous lifestyles. Functional recovery was assessed using the Modified Rankin scale on discharge from hospital. A Rankin score ≤ 2 was the main outcome.
Results: At discharge, 37.2% of the patients were functionally independent. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis established a value of ≥ 18 on the Frenchay Activity Index scale as the best cut-off point to predict favourable outcome (specificity 62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 54–69% and a sensibility of 60%; 95% CI 49–69%) with an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% CI 0.57–0.71). There was a positive association between Frenchay Activity Index ≥ 18 and a Rankin score ≤ 2, after controlling for potential confounders (odds ratio 2.62; 95% CI 1.21–5.66; p = 0.001).
Conclusion: This result emphasizes the protective effect of mental, physical and social activity for the prevention of functional damage after an acute cerebrovascular event.

Authors:

Ana Maria Külzer, Cláudia Collor Scolari, Miguel Gus

Key words:

stroke, lifestyle, disability evaluation

References

  1. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, et al. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council. Stroke 2006; 37: 1583–1633.
  2. Martins T, Ribeiro JP, Garret C. Disability and quality of life of stroke survivors: evaluation nine month after discharge. Rev Neurol 2006; 42: 655–659.
  3. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1998; 19: 1497–1500.
  4. Hendricks HT, Limbeek J, Gertus AC. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1629–1637.
  5. Oliveira GM, Klein CH, Souza e Silva NA. Mortality from cardio­vascular diseases in three Brazilian states from 1980 through 2002. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2006; 19: 85–93.
  6. Ohlsson A-L, Johansson BB. Environment influences functional outcome of cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke 1995; 26: 644-649.
  7. Chamorro A, Vila N, Ascaso C, Saiz A, Montalvo J, Alonso P. Early prediction of stroke severity. Role of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Stroke 1995; 26: 573–576.
  8. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurements natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177–182. Link to article
  9. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh P, Wang CH. Trunk control as an early predictor of compreehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 2626–2630.
  10. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ. Leisure activities and risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2508–2516.
  11. Bragoni M. Caltagirone C, Troisi E, Matteis M, Varnieri F, 
Silvestrini M. Correlation of cerebral hemodynamic changes during mental activity and recovery after stroke. Neurology 2000; 55: 35–40.
  12. Kemperman G, Kuhn GH, Gage FH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in enriched environment. Nature 1997; 386: 493–495. Link to article
  13. Endres M, Gertz K, Lindauer U. Mechanisms of stroke protection by physical activity. Ann Neurol 2003; 54: 582–590.
  14. Wilson RS, Mendes De Leon CF, Barnes LL, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA. Participation in cognitive stimulation activities and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2002; 287: 742–748.
  15. Laurin D, Verreault R, Lindsay Y, MacPherson K, Rockwood K. Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 498–504.
  16. Golstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 660–662.
  17. Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT, Becker KJ, Gammans RE, 
Sabounjian LA, Hammilton S, Morgenstern LB. Shortening the NIH stroke scale for use in the prehospital setting. Stroke. 2002; 33; 2801–2806.
  18. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166–170. Link to article
  19. Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke 1994; 25: 2391–2397.
  20. Cokburn J, Smith PT. Influence of cognitive function on social, domestic, and leisure activities of community-dwelling older people. Int Disabil Studies 1990; 12: 169–172.
  21. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prognosis. Scot Med J 1957; 2: 200–205.
  22. Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PCAJ, De Keyser J, Luijckx G-J. Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel index and the modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2005; 36: 1984–1987.
  23. Turnbull JC, Kersten P, Habib M, McLellan L, Mullee MA, George S. 
Validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in a general population aged 16 years and older Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1034–1038.
  24. Albers GW, Bate VE, Clark WM, Bell R, Verro P, Hamilton S. Intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator for treatment of acute stroke: the standard treatment with atepease to reverse stroke (STARS) study. JAMA 2000; 283: 1145–1150.
  25. Reeves MJ, Arora S, Broderick JP, Frankel M, Heinrich JP, 
Hickenbottom S, et al. Acute stroke care in the US. Results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke 2005; 36: 1236–1240.
  26. Adams HP Jr, Adams RJ, Brott T, del Zoppo GJ, Furlan A, Goldstein LB, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke. A scientific statement of the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke 2003; 34: 1056–1083.
  27. Di Carlo A, Lamasso M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Consoli D, Wolfe DAC, Giroud M. Risk factors and outcome of subtypes of ischemic stroke. Data from a multicenter multinational hospitals-based registry. The European Community Stroke Project. J Neurol Sci 2006; 244: 143–150.
  28. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. The Frenchay Activities Index in stroke in patients: agreement between scores by patients and by relatives. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 454–459.
  29. Tooth LR, Mcenna KT, Smith M, O’Rourke P. Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 656–665. 
.
  30. Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx GJ, Vroomen PC, Stewart RE, De Keyser J. Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between the modified Rankin scale and the Barthel index. J Neurol 2007; 254: 1113–1117.