Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 8/October > pp. 651-657 > Abstract
Original report | Neuromuscular diseases

Effect of carbon-composite knee-ankle-foot orthoses on walking efficiency and gait in former polio patients

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0110

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the effects of total-contact fitted
carbon-composite knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) on energy cost of walking in patients with former polio who normally wear a conventional leather/metal KAFO or plastic/metal KAFO.
Design: A prospective uncontrolled study with a multiple baseline and follow-up design. Follow-up measurements continued until 26 weeks after intervention.
Participants: Twenty adults with polio residuals (mean age 55 years).
Intervention: Each participant received a new carbon-composite KAFO, fitted according to a total-contact principle, which resulted in a rigid, lightweight and well-fitting KAFO.
Outcome measures: Energy cost of walking, walking speed, biomechanics of gait, physical functioning and patient satisfaction.
Results: The energy cost decreased significantly, by 8%, compared with the original KAFO. Furthermore, the incremention energy cost during walking with the carbon-composite KAFO was reduced by 18% towards normative values. An improvement in knee flexion, forward excursion of the centre of pressure, peak ankle moment, and timing of peak ankle power were significantly associated with the decrease in energy cost. Walking speed and physical functioning remained unchanged.
Conclusion: In patients with former polio, carbon-composite KAFOs are superior to conventional leather/metal and plastic/metal KAFOs with respect to improving walking efficiency and gait, and are therefore important in reducing overuse and maintaining functional abilities in polio survivors.

Authors:

Merel-Anne Brehm, Anita Beelen, Caroline A. M. Doorenbosch, Jaap Harlaar and Frans Nollet

Key words:

biomechanics of gait, carbon-composite KAFO, orthosis, post-poliomyelitis syndrome, rehabilitation, walking efficiency.

References

  1. Dean E, Ross J. Movement energetics of individuals with a history of poliomyelitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 478–483. Link to article
  2. Brehm MA, Nollet F, Harlaar J. The energy demands of walking in individuals with postpoliomyelitis syndrome: relationship with muscle strength and reproducibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 136–140.
  3. Halstead LS. Assessment and differential diagnosis for post-polio syndrome. Orthopedics 1991; 14: 1209–1217. 
.
  4. Nollet F, Beelen A, Sargeant AJ, de Visser M, Lankhorst GJ. Submaximal exercise capacity and maximal power output in polio patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1678–1685.
  5. Waring WP, Maynard F, Grady W, Grady R, Boyles C. Influence of appropriate lower extremity orthotic management on ambulation, pain, and fatigue in a postpolio population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 79: 915–919. Link to article
  6. Nollet F, Beelen A, Prins MH, de Visser M, Sargeant AJ, Lankhorst GJ, de Jong BA. Disability and functional assessment in former polio patients with and without postpolio syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 136–143.
  7. Perry J, Barnes G, Gronley JK. The postpolio syndrome. An overuse phenomenon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 233: 145–162.
  8. Perry J, Fontaine JD, Mulroy S. Findings in post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Weakness of muscles of the calf as a source of late pain and fatigue of muscles of the thigh after poliomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1148–1153.
  9. Ivanyi B, Nollet F, Redekop WK, de Haan R, Wohlgemuht M, van Wijngaarden JK, de Visser M. Late onset polio sequelae: disabilities and handicaps in a population-based cohort of the 1956 poliomyelitis outbreak in the Netherlands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 687–690.
  10. Thorén-Jönsson AL, Grimby G. Ability and perceived difficulty in daily activities in people with poliomyelitis sequelae. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 4–11. 
.
  11. Nollet F, Beelen A, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, De Visser M. Perceived health and physical functioning in postpoliomyelitis syndrome: a 6-year prospective follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1048–1056.
  12. Huber SR. Therapeutic application of orthotics. In: Umphred DA, editor. Neurological rehabilitation. Louis: Mosby; 1995, p. 893–910. 
.
  13. Steinfeldt F, Selfert W, Günther KP. Moderne Karbonfaser-Orthetik fr Polio-Patienten Kritische Auswertung nach funktionellen Aspekten Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003; 141: 357–361.
  14. Heim M, Yaacobi E, Azaria M. A pilot study to determine the efficiency of lightweight carbon fibre orthoses in the management of patients suffering from post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 302–305. 
. Link to article
  15. Chambers RB, Elftman N. Orthotic management of the neuropathic and dysvascular patient. In: Goldberg B, Hsu JD, editors. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices. Louis: Mosby; 1997, p. 427–453. 
.
  16. Harlaar J, Redmeijer RA, Tump P, Peters R, Hautus E. The SYBAR system: integrated recording and display of video, EMG, and force plate data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2000; 32: 11–16. 
.
  17. Brehm MA, Harlaar J, Groepenhoff H. The validation of the portable VmaxST system for oxygen-uptake measurement. Gait Posture 2004; 20: 67–73.
  18. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, et al. Standardization and Terminology Committee of the International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 2002; 35: 543–548. 
.
  19. Cappozzo A, Catani F, Della Croce U, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 171–178. Link to article
  20. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The Moss 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247–263.
  21. Garby L, Astrup A. The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis. Acta Physiol Scand 1987; 129: 443–444.
  22. Hof AL. An explicit expression for the moment in multibody systems. Technical note. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1209–1211. Link to article
  23. Wells RP. The projection of the ground reaction force as a predictor of internal joint moments. Bull Prosthet Res 1981; 10–35: 15–19.
  24. Perry J, editor. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK Inc. ; 1992: p. 100. 
.
  25. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121–130. Link to article
  26. Farbu E, Gilhus NE, Barnes MP, Borg K, de Visser M, Driessen A, et al. EFNS guideline on diagnosis and management of post-polio syndrome. Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 795–801. 
.
  27. Bennet BC, Abel MF, Wolovich A, Fromklin F, Kerrigan C, Allaire PE. Abstract of 10th GCMAS meeting, Apr 6–9 2005, Portland (OR), USA. 
.
  28. Cavagna GA, Willems PA, Heglund NC. The role of gravity in human walking: pendular energy exchange, external work and optimal speed. J Physiol 2000; 528: 657–668.
  29. Freeman AJ, Hobart JC, Langdon DW, Thompson AJ. Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 150–156. 
.
  30. Nollet F, Horemans H, Beelen A, Trojan DA, Collet J-P, 
Shapiro S, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded trial
of pyridostigmine in postpolio syndrome Neurology
2000; 55: 899–901.
  31. Horemans HL, Bussmann JB, Beelen A, Stam HJ, Nollet F. Walking in postpoliomyelitis syndrome: the relationships between time-scored tests, walking in daily life and perceived mobility problems. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 142–146.