Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 8/October > pp. 646-650 > Abstract
Original report | Neuromuscular diseases

Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index in polio survivors: A comparison of walking without orthosis, with an ordinary or a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0105

Abstract:

Objective: To examine, for polio survivors, whether walking with a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis (carbon KAFO) is more efficient than walking with an ordinary KAFO or without an orthosis.
Design: Consecutive sample.
Setting: Post-polio clinic, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Participants: Eleven polio survivors who had a carbon KAFO prescribed at the post-polio clinic.
Interventions: A carbon KAFO was prescribed, fabricated and inspected.
Main outcome measures: Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index.
Results: An ordinary KAFO weighed 1403 g (standard deviation(SD) 157 g), whereas a carbon KAFO weighed 992 g (SD 168 g). Subjects walking with a carbon KAFO showed a tendency to increase step length, and to increase speed significantly compared with walking without an orthosis and with an ordinary KAFO (paired t-test, p < 0.05). Oxygen consumption per body weight, oxygen cost (O2 consumption for 1-m walk divided by body weight) and physiological cost index ((heart rate at 3-min walk – heart rate at rest) /speed) were significantly lower than those walking without an orthosis (–16%, –35%, –33%; paired t-test, p < 0.05) and were lower than those walking with an ordinary KAFO (–9%, –14%, –15%; paired t-test, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The gait efficiency of polio survivors with a carbon KAFO was objectively better than those without an orthosis or with an ordinary KAFO.

Authors:

Kenji Hachisuka, Kenichiro Makino, Futoshi Wada, Satoru Saeki and Nami Yoshimoto

Key words:

polio, knee-ankle-foot orthosis, carbon orthosis, oxygen consumption, physiological cost index.

References

  1. Jubelt B, Miller JR. Viral infections. In: Rowland LP, editor. Merrit’s textbook of neurology. 9th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995, p. 142–179.
  2. Halstead LS, Wiechers DO. Late effects of poliomyelitis. Miami: Symposia Foundation, 1985.
  3. Dalakas MC, Elder G, Hallett M, Ravits J, Baker M, Papadopoulos 
N, et al. Long-term follow-up study of patients with post-­poliomyelitis neuromuscular symptoms. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 959–963.
  4. Halstead LD, Rossi CD. Post-polio syndrome: clinical experience with 132 consecutive outpatients. In: Halstead LS, Wiechers DO, editors. Research and clinical aspects of the late effects of poliomyelitis. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation; 1987, p. 13–26.
  5. Sunnerhagen KS, Grimby G. Muscular effects in late polio. Act Physiol Scand 2001; 171: 335–340.
  6. Hachisuka K. Post-polio syndrome: its diagnosis and treatment. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2002; 39: 642–647.
  7. Trojan DA, Cashman NR. Post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2004; 31: 6–19.
  8. Trojan DA, Finch L. Management of post-polio syndrome. Neuro
rehabilitation 1997; 8: 93–105. Link to article
  9. Nelham RL. Carbon fibre reinforced plastic applied to prosthetics and orthotics. J Biomed Eng 1981; 3: 305–314. Link to article
  10. Granata C, De Lollis A, Campo G, Piancastelli L, Merlini L. Analysis, design and development of a carbon fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis prototype for myopathic patients. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1990; 204: 91–96.
  11. Heim M, Yaacobi E, Azaria M. A pilot study to determine the efficiency of lightweight carbon fibre orthoses in the management of patients suffering from post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 302–305. Link to article
  12. Steinfeldt F, Seifert W, Gunther KP. Modern carbon fibre orthoses in the management of polio patients – a critical evaluation of the functional aspects. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003; 141: 357–361.
  13. Hachisuka K, Makino K, Wada F, Saeki S, Yoshimoto N. Clinical application of carbon fiber reinforced plastic leg orthosis for polio survivors and its advantages and disadvantages. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30: 129–135.
  14. Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Energy expenditure in stroke subjects walking with a carbon composite ankle foot orthosis. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 165–168.
  15. MacGregor J. The objective measurement of physical performance with long term ambulatory physiological surveillance equipment (LAPSE). In: Stoot FD, Raftery EB, Goulding L, editors, Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Ambulatory Monitoring. London: Academic Press; 1979, p. 29–39.
  16. Halstead LS. Diagnosing postpolio syndrome: inclusion and exclusion criteria. In: Silver JK, Gawne AC, editors. Postpolio syndrome. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2004, p. 1–20.
  17. Trojan DA, Cashman NR, Shapiro S, Tansey CM, Esdaile JM. Predictive factors for post-poliomyelitis syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 770–777.
  18. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peri
pheral nervous system. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1982, p.
  19. Tyson SF, Thornton HA. The effect of a hinged ankle foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: objective and measures and users’ opinions. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 53–58.
  20. Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S, Dozono K. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel index. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 28–35. Link to article
  21. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Aging 1983; 12: 166–170. Link to article
  22. Hachisuka K, Chisaka H, Kawazu T, Saeki S, Negayama S: Applied activities of daily living and its standard value determined according to Frenchay Activities Index for randomly sampled middle and advanced age people living at home. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2001; 38: 287–295.
  23. Cuddeford TJ, Freeling RP, Thomas SS, Aiona MD, Rex D, Sirolli H, et al. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 239–242.
  24. Graham RC, Smith NM, White CM. The reliability and validity of the Physiological Cost Index in healthy subjects while walking on 2 different tracks. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2041–2046.