Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 8/October > pp. 591-597 > Abstract
Original report | Other

Early-stage impairments and limitations of functioning from the geriatric ICF core set as determinants of independent living in older patients after discharge from post-acute rehabilitation

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0093

Abstract:

Objective: To identify the impairments and limitations that indicate loss of independence in older patients after discharge from post-acute rehabilitation.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Subjects/patients: A total of 128 patients in the development cohort and 137 patients in the validation cohort.
methods: Data on functioning and previous living situation were collected at admission; data on prospective living situation were collected at discharge. Multivariable logistic and non-parametric (CART) analyses were carried out with the development cohort. The resulting models were validated in a validation cohort.
Results: Development cohort: mean age was 80.3 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 79.1–81.6), 52% of patients experienced loss of independence. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) category d465 “moving around using equipment” (odds ratio (OR) = 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.8) and a dichotomous indicator variable for fractures or joint replacement (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.9) remained in the logistic model. CART yielded the ICF categories d465 “moving around using equipment”, and b765 “involuntary movement functions” conditional on d465. Validation cohort: mean age was 72.6 years (95% CI 70.3–74.9). 40% experienced loss of independence. d465 (OR = 7.6, 95% CI 1.6–35.5) and b765 (OR = 5.9, 95% CI 2.6–13.4) were also significant predictors in the logistic model.
Conclusion: Older patients who are not able to move around with the help of equipment at the beginning of post-acute
rehabilitation are 3 times as likely to lose independence when discharged. It may be important for patients’ independent living to encourage the use of wheelchairs and walking aids at very early stages of rehabilitation.

Authors:

Eva Grill, Susanne Joisten, Walter Swoboda and Gerold Stucki

Key words:

aged, rehabilitation, disability, outcome assessment (healthcare), ICF.

References

  1. Stucki G, Stier-Jarmer M, Grill E, Melvin J. Rationale and principles of early rehabilitation care after an acute injury or illness. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 353–359.
  2. Williams ME, editor. The American Geriatrics Society‘s complete guide to aging & health. New York: Harmony Books; 1995.
  3. Hager K, Nennmann U. Rehabilitation of the elderly – influence of age, sex, main diagnosis and activities of daily living (ADL) on the elderly patients‘ return to their previous living conditions. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1997; 25: 131–139. Link to article
  4. Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, Eilertsen TB, Hrincevich CA, Tropea DA, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings. JAMA 1997; 277: 396–404. Link to article
  5. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S. The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 1291–1294. Link to article
  6. Hanks RA, Lichtenberg PA. Physical, psychological, and social outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 783–792. Link to article
  7. Landi F, Bernabei R, Russo A, Zuccala G, Onder G, Carosella L, et al. Predictors of rehabilitation outcomes in frail patients treated in a geriatric hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 679–684.
  8. Patrick L, Knoefel F, Gaskowski P, Rexroth D. Medical comorbidity and rehabilitation efficiency in geriatric inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 1471–1477.
  9. Aditya BS, Sharma JC, Allen SC, Vassallo M. Predictors of a nursing home placement from a non-acute geriatric hospital. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 108–113.
  10. Hajek VE, Gagnon S, Ruderman JE. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: an analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1331–1337. Link to article
  11. Kagaya H, Takahashi H, Sugawara K, Dobashi M, Kiyokawa N, Ebina H. Predicting outcomes after hip fracture repair. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 46–51.
  12. Sager MA, Rudberg MA, Jalaluddin M, Franke T, Inouye SK, Landefeld CS, et al. Hospital admission risk profile (HARP): identifying older patients at risk for functional decline following acute medical illness and hospitalization. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 251–257.
  13. McKenna K, Tooth L, Strong J, Ottenbacher K, Connell J, Cleary M. Predicting discharge outcomes for stroke patients in Australia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 47–56.
  14. World Health Organisation (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
  15. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 932–938.
  16. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 361–366.
  17. Grill E, Hermes R, Swoboda W, Uzarewicz C, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Set for geriatric patients in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 411–417.
  18. Grill E, Stucki G, Boldt C, Joisten S, Swoboda W. Identification of relevant ICF categories by geriatric patients in an early post-acute rehabilitation facility. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 467–473.
  19. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics 1980; A10: 1043–1069.
  20. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–843.
  21. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C, editors. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1984.
  22. Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Classification and regression trees (CART) used for the exploration of prognostic factors measured on different scales. In: Dirschedl P, Ostermann R, editors. Computational statistics. Heidelberg: Physica; 1994, p. 483–496.
  23. SAS Institute. %treedisc macro. 1995 [cited 2006 March 25]. Available from: http://www. stat. edu/faculty/moser/exst7037/treedisc. html
.
  24. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373–1379. Link to article
  25. Blower PW, Carter LC, Sulch DA. Relationship between wheelchair propulsion and independent walking in hemiplegic stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 606–608.
  26. Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A, Todd I. Predicting those who will walk after rehabilitation in a specialist stroke unit. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 149–152.
  27. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 1263–1270.
  28. Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, Boulanger YL. Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Predicting discharge disposition. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75: 431–436. Link to article
  29. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 556–561. Link to article
  30. Lai SM, Alter M, Friday G, Lai SL, Sobel E. Disposition after acute stroke: who is not sent home from hospital? Neuroepidemiology 1998; 17: 21–29. Link to article
  31. Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 384–392. Link to article
  32. Hoenig H, Siebens HC. Geriatric rehabilitation: new frontiers in geriatrics research: an agenda for surgical and related medical specialties. 2004 [cited 2006 June 20]. Available from: http://www. frycomm. com/ags/rasp/chapter. asp?ch = 12
.
  33. Dodge HH, Kadowaki T, Hayakawa T, Yamakawa M, Sekikawa A, Ueshima H. Cognitive impairment as a strong predictor of incident disability in specific ADL-IADL tasks among community-dwelling elders: the Azuchi Study. Gerontologist 2005; 45: 222–230.
  34. Hoenig H, Siebens H. Research agenda for geriatric rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 858–866.
  35. Sager MA, Dunham NC, Schwantes A, Mecum L, Halverson K, Harlowe D. Measurement of activities of daily living in hospitalized elderly: a comparison of self-report and performance-based methods. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 457–462.
  36. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000; 19: 453–473.