Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 103-108 > Abstract
Review article | Stroke

Early supported discharge after stroke

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0042

Abstract:

Patients after stroke conventionally receive much of their rehabilitation in hospital. Services have been developed that offer patients an early discharge from hospital with more rehabilitation at home (early supported discharge). This paper sets out a systematic review of all randomized trials of early supported discharge services that included 12 trials (1659 patients). There was a reduced odds of death or dependency equivalent to 5 fewer adverse outcomes (95% confidence interval 1–10) for every 100 patients receiving an early supported discharge service (p = 0.04). Patients receiving early supported discharge services showed an 8 day reduction (p < 0.0001) in the length of hospital stay. The greatest benefits were seen in the trials evaluating a co-ordinated multidisciplinary early supported discharge team and with patients with mild-moderate disability. The experience of a trial from Stockholm is described in order to explore the potential mechanism of action of early supported discharge services. In conclusion, an illustrative case report is set out, indicating a typical patient pathway in an early supported discharge service.

Authors:

Peter Langhorne and Lotta Widen-Holmqvist

References

  1. Warlow CP, Dennis MS, van Gijn J, Hankey GJ, Sandercock PAG, Bamford JM, et al, editors. Stroke: a practical guide to management. Edinburgh: Blackwell Science; 2001.
  2. Kalra L, Evans E, Perez I, Knapp M, Donaldson N, Swift C. Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 894–899.
  3. Langhorne P, Dennis M, Kalra L, Shepperd S, Wade D, Wolfe C. Services for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admission. In: The Cochrane library, issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
  4. Early Supported Discharge trialists. Services for reducing the duration of hospital care in stroke patients (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane library, issue 2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005.
  5. Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G, Dennis M, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, et al. Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 365: 501–506.
  6. Clarke M, Oxman A (eds). Cochrane reviewers' handbook. Version 4. 0 (updated March 2003). In: The Cochrane library, issue 4. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003.
  7. Sandercock P (ed. The Cochrane library, issue 4. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003.
  8. Askim T, Rohweder G, Lydersen S, Indredavik B. Evaluation of an extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge for patients living in a rural community. A randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 238–248.
  9. Teng J, Mayo NE, Latimer E, Hanley J, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, et al. Costs and caregiver consequences of early supported discharge for stroke patients. Stroke 2003; 34: 528–536.
  10. McNamee P, Christensen J, Soutter J, et al. Cost analysis of early supported hospital discharge for stroke. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 345–351. 
. Link to article
  11. Anderson C, Mhurchu CN, Rubenach S, Clark M, Spencer C, Winsor A. Hospital or home for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomised controlled trial. II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke 2000; 31: 1032–1037. 
.
  12. Beech R, Rudd AG, Tilling K, et al. Economic consequences of early supported discharge to community-based rehabilitation for stroke in an inner-London teaching hospital. Stroke 1999; 30: 729–375. 
.
  13. von Koch L, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Kostulas V, Almazan J, Widen Holmqvist L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke: one-year follow-up of patient outcome, resource use and cost. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001; 12: 131–138.
  14. Widén Holmqvist L, von Koch L, Kostulas V, Holm M, Widsell G, Tegler H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. Stroke 1998; 29: 591–597.
  15. Widén Holmqvist L, von Koch L, de Pedro-Cuesta J. Use of health care, impact on family caregivers and patient satisfaction of rehabilitation at home after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000; 32: 164–170. 
.
  16. von Koch L, Widén Holmqvist L, Wohlin Wottrich A, Tham K, de Pedro Cuesta J. Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualized intervention. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 574–583. 
.
  17. Widén Holmqvist L, von Koch L. Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation. BMJ 2001; 322: 1501–1502.
  18. von Koch L, Wohlin Wottrich A, Widén Holmqvist L. Rehabilitation in the home versus the hospital: the importance of context. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20: 367–368.
  19. Newell JT, Wood VA, Langton Hewer R, Tinson DJ. Development of a neurological rehabilitation environment: an observational study. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 146–155. Link to article
  20. Thorsén A, Widén Holmqvist L, de Pedro Cuesta J, von Koch L. A randomized controlled trial of early supported discharge and continued rehabilitation at home after stroke. Five-year follow-up of patient outcome. Stroke 2005; 36: 297–302.
  21. Thorsén AM, Widén Holmqvist L, von Koch L. Early supported discharge and continued rehabilitation at home after stroke: 5-year follow-up of resource use. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 15: 139–143.