Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 109-114 > Abstract
Special report | Stroke

Stroke, complex regional pain syndrome and phantom limb pain: Can commonalities direct future management?

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0027

Abstract:

Despite being different conditions, complex regional pain syndrome type 1, phantom limb pain and stroke share some potentially important similarities. This report examines experimental and clinical findings from each patient population. It identifies common aspects of symptomatic presentation, sensory phenomena and patterns of cortical reorganization. Based on these common findings, we argue that established principles of stroke rehabilitation are also applicable to rehabilitation of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and phantom limb pain. In addition, we contend that promising treatment approaches for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and phantom limb pain may be helpful in stroke rehabilitation. Examples of emerging supportive evidence for these hypotheses are provided and discussed.

Authors:

Nicole E. Acerra, Tina Souvlis and G. Lorimer Moseley

Key words:

stroke, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, physiotherapy, sensorimotor cortex, cortical reorganization, neurorehabilitation.

References

  1. Buonomano D, Merzenich M. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998; 21: 149–186. 
. Link to article
  2. Cramer SC. Functional imaging in stroke recovery. Stroke 2004; 35: 2695–2698. 
.
  3. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Cortical reorganization during recovery from complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2004; 63: 693–701. 
.
  4. Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, Grusser S. Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet 2001; 357: 1763–1764. 
.
  5. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 573–579. 
.
  6. Schwartzman RJ. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 1993; 6: 531–536. 
.
  7. Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 43–53.
  8. Wasner G, Schattschneider J, Binder A, Baron R. Complex regional pain syndrome – diagnostic, mechanisms, CNS involvement and therapy. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 61–75. 
.
  9. Daviet JC, Preux PM, Salle JY, Lebreton F, Munoz M, Dudognon P, et al. Clinical factors in the prognosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I after stroke – a prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2002; 81: 34–39. 
.
  10. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. 
.
  11. Janig W, Baron R. Complex regional pain syndrome is a disease of the central nervous system. Clin Autonom Res 2002; 12: 150–164. 
.
  12. Zollinger PE, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW, Breederveld RS. Effect of vitamin C on frequency of reflex sympathetic dystrophy in wrist fractures: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 2025–2028. 
.
  13. Melis M, Zawawi K, Al-Badawi E, Lobo SL, Mehta N. Complex regional pain syndrome in the head and neck: a review of the literature. J Orofac Pain 2002; 16: 93–104. 
.
  14. Papay FA, Verghese A, StantonHicks M, Zins J. Complex regional pain syndrome of the breast in a patient after breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39: 347–352. 
. Link to article
  15. Grande LA, Loeser JD, Ozuna J, Ashleigh A, Samii A. Complex regional pain syndrome as a stress response. Pain 2004; 110: 495–498. 
.
  16. Flor H. Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2002; 1: 182–189. 
.
  17. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs – The DO Hebb lecture. Brain 1998; 121: 1603–1630. Link to article
  18. Dykes RW. Mechanisms controlling neuronal plasticity in somatosensory cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1997; 75: 535–545. 
. Link to article
  19. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003. 
.
  20. Nudo RJ, Friel KM. Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1999; 155: 713–717. 
.
  21. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 1844–1848. 
.
  22. Juottonen K, Gockel M, Silen T, Hurri H, Hari R, Forss N. Altered central sensorimotor processing in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2002; 98: 315–323. 
.
  23. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Patterns of cortical reorganization in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2003; 61: 1707–1715. 
.
  24. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, et al. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 1995; 375: 482–484. 
. Link to article
  25. Janet P. Un cas d’allochirie. In: Névroses et idées fixés. Paris; 1898, p. 234–262. 
.
  26. Sathian K. Intermanual referral of sensation to anesthetic hands. Neurology 2000; 54: 1866–1868. 
.
  27. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995; 377: 489–490. 
. Link to article
  28. Acerra NE, Moseley GL. Dysynchiria: watching the mirror image of the unaffected limb elicits pain on the affected side. Neurology 2005; 65: 751–753.
  29. Bausbaum A, Bushnell MC, Devor, M. Pain: basic mechanisms. In: Justins DM, ed. Pain 2005 – an updated review. Seattle: IASP Press; 2005, p. 3–9.
  30. McLachlan EM, Janig W, Devor M, Michaelis M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. Nature 1993; 363: 543–546. Link to article
  31. Koltzenburg M, Wall PD, McMahon SB. Does the right side know what the left is doing? Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 122–127. Link to article
  32. Milligan ED, Twining C, Chacur M, Biedenkapp J, O’Connor K, Poole S, et al. Spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines mediate mirror-image neuropathic pain in rats. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 1026–1040.
  33. Watkins LR, Maier SF. Beyond neurons: Evidence that immune and glial cells contribute to pathological pain states. Physiol Rev 2002; 82: 981–1011.
  34. Fukumoto M, Ushida T, Zinchuk VS, Yamamoto H, Yoshida S. Contralateral thalamic perfusion in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Lancet 1999; 354: 1790–1791.
  35. Dostrovsky JO. Ascending spinal and trigeminal nociceptive pathways. In: Justins DM, editor. Pain 2005 – an updated review: refresher course syllabus. Seattle: IASP Press; 2005, p. 43–48.
  36. Maihofner C, Forster C, Birklein F, Neundorfer B, Handwerker HO. Brain processing during mechanical hyperalgesia in complex regional pain syndrome: a functional MRI study. Pain 2005; 114: 93–103.
  37. Ramachandran VS. A brief tour of human consciousness: from impostor poodles to purple numbers. New York: PI Press; 2004.
  38. Turton AJ, Butler SR. Referred sensations following stroke. Neurocase 2001; 7: 397–405. 
.
  39. McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Halligan PW, Blake DR. Referred sensations in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1067–1073.
  40. Grusser SM, Muhlnickel W, Schaefer M, Villringer K, 
Christmann C, Koeppe C, et al. Remote activation of referred phantom sensation and cortical reorganization in human upper extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res 2004; 154: 97–102.
  41. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Elbert T, Flor H, Hohling C, Pantev C, et al. Reorganizational and perceptional changes after amputation. Brain 1996; 119: 1213–1219. 
. Link to article
  42. Gandevia S, Phegan C. Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. J Phys (Lond) 1999; 514: 609–616. 
.
  43. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, 
Llewellyn DME, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet 1999; 353: 2035–2036. 
.
  44. McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EFJ, Halligan PW, Wall PD, Blake DR. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology 2003; 42: 97–101. 
.
  45. Dijkerman HC, Letswaart M, Johnston M, MacWalter RS. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehab 2004; 18: 538–549. 
.
  46. Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2004; 108: 192–198. 
.
  47. Moseley GL. Is successful rehabilitation of complex regional pain syndrome due to sustained attention to the affected limb? A randomised clinical trial. Pain 2005; 114: 54–61.
  48. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation – a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 237–251. 
.
  49. Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL. Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 73–76. 
.
  50. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: view
ing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 2005; 163: 118–122.
  51. Acerra NE, Souvlis T, Moseley GL. Does mirror-box therapy improve sensory and motor changes in the early post-stroke population? A randomised-controlled trial. In: Joint Conference of the National Neurology and Gerontology Groups of the Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2005 November; Melbourne, Australia: Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2005, p.
  52. Dickstein R, Dunsky A, Marcovitz E. Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiparesis. Phys Ther 2004; 84: 1167–1178.
  53. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 1171–1180. 
.
  54. Yue G, Cole KJ. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 1992; 67: 1114–1123.
  55. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996; 3: 131–141. 
. Link to article
  56. Sterr A, Freivogel S. Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies. Neurology 2004; 63: 2176–2177. 
.
  57. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210–1216. 
.
  58. Sterr A, Muller M, Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Development of cortical reorganization in the somatosensory cortex of adult Braille students. Functional neuroscience: evoked potentials and magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1999 49: 292–298. 
.
  59. Pantev C, Engelien A, Candia V, Elbert T. Representational cortex in musicians: plastic alterations in response to musical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 930: 300-14.
  60. Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis. Neurology 2003; 61: 842–844. 
.
  61. Stanton-Hicks M, Baron R, Boas R, Gordh T, Harden N, Hendler N, et al. Complex regional pain syndromes: guidelines for therapy. Clin J Pain 1998; 14: 155–166. Link to article
  62. Butler SH. Disuse and CRPS. In: Harden RN, Baron R, Janig W, eds. Complex regional pain syndrome: progress in pain research and management. Seattle: IASP Press; 2001, p. 141–150. 
.
  63. Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain 2003; 4: 109–121. 
.
  64. Waylett-Rendall J. Desensitization of the traumatized hand. In: Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, eds. Rehabilitation of the hand: surgery and therapy. Third edn. St Louis: Mosby; 1990, p. 1258.