Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 170-174 > Abstract
Original report | Stroke, Methodological studies

Gait in hemiplegia: evaluation of clinical features with the wisconsin gait scale

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0026

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the ability of the Wisconsin Gait Scale to evaluate qualitative features of changes in hemiplegic gait in post-stroke patients.
Design: A prospective observational study.
Subjects: Ten healthy subjects and 56 hemiplegic outpatients, more than 12 months post-stroke, consecutively admitted in a rehabilitation centre.
Methods: Patients were videotaped while walking at a comfortable speed. Quantitative and clinical gait parameters were derived from videotaped walking tasks at admission and at the end of a period of rehabilitation training. Qualitative features were assessed using the Wisconsin Gait Scale. Functional status was rated through the modified Barthel Index.
Results: After training, the median Wisconsin Gait Scale score improved significantly (28 vs 26.5; p = 0.003). In particular, “weight shift to paretic side” and patterns during the swing phase of the affected leg were improved. Gait velocity (0.3 vs 0.4 m/sec; p = 0.001) and stride length (77 vs 85 cm; p = 0.0002) increased significantly, whereas number of steps (25 vs 23; p = 0.004), stride period (2.5 vs 2.3 sec; p = 0.04), and stance period (2.1 vs 2 sec; p = 0.03) of the unaffected side were reduced. The Barthel Index score increased (71 vs 78; p = 0.005).
Conclusion: The Wisconsin Gait Scale is a useful tool to rate qualitative gait alterations of post-stroke hemiplegic subjects and to assess changes over time during rehabilitation training. It may be used when a targeted and standardized characterization of hemiplegic gait is needed for tailoring rehabilitation and monitoring results.

Authors:

Assunta Pizzi, Giovanna Carlucci, Catuscia Falsini, Francesco Lunghi, Sonia Verdesca and Antonello Grippo

Key words:

hemiplegia, stroke, gait, rehabilitation, qualitative gait analysis, outcome.

References

  1. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Hewer RL. Walking after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987; 19: 25–30.
  2. Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 119–122.
  3. Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JL, Bouchard­ JP, Brunet D. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 612–620. 
. Link to article
  4. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol, Neurosurg, Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177–182. 
. Link to article
  5. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982–989.
  6. Bohannon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm JB. Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. Int J Rehab Res 1991; 14: 246–250.
  7. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dumas F, Tardif D. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Cruik RL, Oatis CA editors. Gait analysis: theory and application. St Louis: Mosby; 1995, p. 355–364.
  8. Thaut M, Mclntosh G, Rice R. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci 1997; 151: 207–212. Link to article
  9. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1074–1082. Link to article
  10. Brandstater ME, deBruin H, Gowland C, Clark BM. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 583–587.
  11. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM. Gait after stroke: initial deficit and changes in temporal patterns for each gait phase. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1057–1065.
  12. Hill K, Goldie P, Baker P, Greenwood K. Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch System. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 577–583.
  13. Hesse S, Jahnke M, Bertelt C, Schreiner C, Lucke D, Mauritz K-H. Gait outcome in ambulatory hemiparetic patients after a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program and prognostic factors. Stroke 1994; 25: 1999–2004.
  14. Perry J. The mechanics of walking in hemiplegia. Clin Orthop 1969; 63: 23–31.
  15. Rodriquez AA, Black PO, Kile KA, Sherman J, Stellberg B, McCormick J. Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 801–805. Link to article
  16. Rubertone JA, Baldwin K, Bucknum J, Elias S, Mitchell D, 
Sukenick J. Reliability analysis of the Wisconsin Gait Scale for novice evaluators. Phys Ther 2000; 80: S19.
  17. Wellmon R, Campbell SL, Rubertone JA, Ellison M, King R, Meduri C, et al. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Wisconsin Gait Scale when administered by physical therapists to individuals post-stroke. Proceedings of the American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections Meetings. Tampa, 
Florida, 2003.
  18. Turani N, Kemiksizoglu A, Karatas M, Ozker R. Assessment of hemiplegic gait using the Wisconsin Gait Scale. Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 103–108.
  19. Mahoney FD, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965; 14: 61–63.
  20. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703–709. Link to article
  21. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78–81.
  22. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61–63. 
.
  23. Garcia RK, Nelson AJ, Ling W, Van Olden C. Comparing stepping-in-place and gait ability in adults with and without hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 36–42.
  24. Bobath B, editor. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and physiotherapy. London: William Heinemann Medical Books; 1978.
  25. Dettmann M, Linder M, Sepie S. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med 1987; 66: 77–90. 
.
  26. Wall J, Turnbull G. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 550–553.
  27. Titianova E, Pitkanen K, Paakkonen A, Sivenius J, Tarkka I. Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 778–786.
  28. Good DC. Physiotherapy strategies for enhancing motor recovery in stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Rehabil 1994; 8: 177–186.