Index > Vol. 39/2007 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 126-132 > Abstract
Original report | Pain problems and muscoloskeletal disorders

Stretching exercises vs manual therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized, controlled cross-over trial

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0015

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the effects of manual therapy and stretching exercise on neck pain and disability.
Design: An examiner-blinded randomized cross-over trial.
Patients: A total of 125 women with non-specific neck pain.
Methods: Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 received manual therapy twice weekly and Group 2 perform­ed stretching exercises 5 times a week. After 4 weeks the treat­ments were changed. The follow-up times were after 4 and 12 weeks. Neck pain (visual analogue scale) and disability indices were measured.
Results: Mean value (standard deviation) for neck pain was 50 mm (22) and 49 mm (19) at baseline in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, and decreased during the first 4 weeks by 26 mm (95% Confidence Interval 20–33) and 19 mm (12–27), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups. Neck and shoulder pain and disability index decreased significantly more in Group 1 after manual therapy (p=0.01) as well as neck stiffness (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Both stretching exercise and manual therapy considerably decreased neck pain and disability in women with non-specific neck pain. The difference in effectiveness between the 2 treatments was minor. Low-cost stretching exercises can be recommended in the first instance as an appropriate therapy intervention to relieve pain, at least in the short-term.

Authors:

Jari Ylinen, Hannu Kautiainen, Kaija Wirén and Arja Häkkinen

Key words:

cervical pain, home exercise, massage, mobilization, rehabilitation, training.

References

  1. Aromaa A, Koskinen S, eds. Health and functional capacity in Finland. Baseline results of the Health 2000 health examination survey. Publications of the National Public Health Institute B3/2002, Helsinki, 2002. 
.
  2. Webb R, Brammah T, Lunt M, Urwin M, Allison T, Symmons D. Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population. Spine 2003; 28: 1195–1202. 
.
  3. Kjellman G, Öberg B, Hensing G, Alexandersson K. 12-year 
follow-up of subjects initially sicklisted with neck/shoulder or low back diagnoses. Phys Res Inter 2001; 6: 52–63.
  4. Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Boulter LM. Cost of illness in neck pain in the Netherlands in 1996. Pain 1999; 80: 629–636. 
.
  5. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Results of a follow-up survey. JAMA 1998; 280: 1569–1575. Link to article
  6. Irnich D, Behrens N, Molzen H, König A, Gleditsch J, Krauss M, et al. Randomised trial of acupuncture compared with conventional massage and “sham” laser acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck pain. BMJ 2001; 322: 1–6.
  7. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DE; Davis RB, Kessler R, Phillips RS. Patterns and perceptions of care for treatment of back and neck pain: results of a national survey. Spine 2003; 28: 292–297.
  8. Ylinen J, Takala EP, Nykänen M, Häkkinen A, Mälkiä E, 
Pohjolainen T, et al. Active neck muscle training in the treatment of chronic neck pain in women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 2509–2516.
  9. Furlan AD, Brosseau L, Imamura M, Irvin E. Massage for low-back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2002; 27: 1896–1910. 
.
  10. Hoving JL, Koes BW, De Vet HC, Assendelft WJ, Van der Windt DA, Van Mameren H, et al. Manual therapy, physical therapy or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: short-term results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 713–722.
  11. Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ader HJ, de Vet HC, et al. Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2003; 26; 326: 911–914.
  12. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71–76. Link to article
  13. Grossman SA, Sheidler VR, McGuire DB, Geer C, Santor D, 
Piantadosi S. A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1992; 7: 196–203. Link to article
  14. Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10-cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 87–89. Link to article
  15. Viikari-Juntura E, Takala E-P, Alaranta H. Neck and shoulder 
pain and disability. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988; 20: 167–173.
  16. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipul Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409–415.
  17. Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998; 21: 75–80. 
.
  18. Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM, Spadoni G, Westaway MD, Padfield B. Using the Neck Disability Index to make decisions concerning individual patients. Physiother Canada 1999; 51: 107–112.
  19. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P. The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine 2004; 29: 1923–1930.
  20. Keltinkangas-Järvinen L, Rimon R. Rimon’s brief depression scale, a rapid method for screening de­pression. Psychol Rep 1987; 60: 111–119.
  21. Ylinen J, Cash M, eds. Sports massage. London: Stanley Paul; 1988.
  22. Ylinen J, ed. Stretching therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier Ltd; 2006. 
.
  23. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 12–20.
  24. Brodin H. Cervical pain and mobilization. Int J Rehab Res 1984; 7: 190–191. 
. Link to article
  25. Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Niere K, Shirley D, et al. Manipulative therapy and a low load exercise regimen each reduced the frequency and intensity of cervicogenic headache. Spine 2002; 27: 1835–1843.
  26. Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Wouters LL, Janssens K. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment technique in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003; 33: 369–378.
  27. Levoska S, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S. Active or passive physio­therapy for occupational cervicobrachial disorders? A comparison of two treatment methods with a 1-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 425–430.
  28. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine 1996; 21: 1746–1759. Link to article
  29. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, Essers AH, Verstegen GM, Hofhuizen DM, et al. Randomised clinical trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one-year follow-up. BMJ 1992; 304: 601–605. Link to article
  30. Whitman JM, Fritz JM, Childs MJD. The influence of experience and specialty certifications on clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain treated within a standardized physical therapy management program. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34: 662–675.
  31. Kjellman G, Skargren E, Öberg B. Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 364–370.
  32. Skargren EI, Öberg BE. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of low-back and neck pain in patients treated in primary care: comparison between the treatment strategies chiropractic and physiotherapy. Pain 1998; 77: 201–207. Link to article