Index > Vol. 37/2005 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 100-107 > Abstract
 

COPING STRATEGY USE: DOES IT PREDICT ADJUSTMENT TO CHRONIC BACK PAIN AFTER CONTROLLING FOR CATASTROPHIC THINKING AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR PAIN CONTROL?

Issue: Volume 37, Issue 2, March 2005

Pages: 100-107

DOI: 10.1080/16501970410021535

Abstract:

Objective: To explore whether coping strategy use predicted levels of adjustment in chronic low back pain after controlling for the influence of catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control. Methods: Eighty-four patients with chronic low back pain completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, a pain VAS and the Roland Disability Questionnaire. To derive composite measures of coping, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire subscales, excluding the Catastrophizing subscale and 2 single-item scales, were entered into a principal components analysis. The extent to which scores on the coping measures predicted levels of adjustment after controlling for catastrophic thinking (Catastrophizing subscale) and self-efficacy for pain control (2 single-item scales) was explored using sequential multiple regression analysis. Results: Two coping dimensions emerged from the principal components analysis, which were labelled Distraction and Praying or Hoping, and Denial of Pain and Persistence. Scores obtained on these coping measures explained an additional 5% and 13% of the variance in pain intensity and disability, respectively. Interestingly, however, the scores on the coping measures did not predict pain intensity or disability after controlling for the influence of catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control. Conclusion: Coping strategy use might only be related to levels of adjustment via the effect it has on catastrophic thinking and self-efficacy for pain control.

Authors:

Steve R. Woby A1 A2, Paul J. Watson A3, Neil K. Roach A4, Martin Urmston A1 A2
A1 Department of Physiotherapy North Manchester General Hospital Manchester
A2 Centre for Rehabilitation Science University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary Oxford Road Manchester
A3 University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management Leicester General Hospital Leicester
A4 Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Department of Exercise and Sport Science Manchester Metropolitan University MMU Cheshire at Alsager UK

Key words:

coping, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, chronic low back pain, catastrophic, self-efficacy

References:

  1. Croft PR, Rigby AS Socioeconomic influences on back problems in the community in Britain 1994; 48: 166-170J Epidemiol Community Health
  2. Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Ferry S, Jayson MI, Silman AJ Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population. Evidence from the South Manchester back pain survey 1995; 20: 1889-1894Spine
  3. McKinnon ME, Vickers MR, Ruddock VM, Townsend J, Meade TW Community studies of the health service implications of low back pain 1997; 22: 2161-2166Spine
  4. Croft PR, MacFarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Silman AJ Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study 1998; 316: 1356-1359BMJ
  5. Watson PJ, Main CJ, Waddell G, Gales TF, Purcell-Jones G Medically certified work loss, recurrence and costs of wage compensation for back pain: a follow-up study of the working population of Jersey 1998; 37: 82-86Br J Rheumatol
  6. Gatchel RJ, Gardea MA Psychosocial issues. Their importance in predicting disability, response to treatment, and search for compensation 1999; 17: 149-166Neurol Clin
  7. Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey 1995; 20: 11-19Spine
  8. Loeser JD The prevention of needless pain: research opportunities 1994; 23: 709-711Prev Med
  9. van den Hoogen HM, Koes BW, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back Pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature 1995; 20: 318-327Spine
  10. Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. 1983; Pain and behavioral medicine. A cognitive-behavioral perspective
  11. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment 1983; 17: 33-44Pain
  12. Turner JA, Clancy S Strategies for coping with chronic low back pain: relationship to pain and disability 1986; 24: 355-364Pain
  13. Spinhoven P, Ter Kuile MM, Linssen AC, Gazendam B Pain coping strategies in a Dutch population of chronic low back pain patients 1989; 37: 77-83Pain
  14. Dozois DJ, Dobson KS, Wong M, Hughes D, Long A Predictive utility of the CSQ in low back pain: individual vs composite measures 1996; 66: 171-180Pain
  15. Chaves JF, Brown JM Spontaneous cognitive strategies for the control of clinical pain and stress 1987; 10: 263-276J Behav Med
  16. Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation 1995; 7: 524-532Psychol Assess
  17. Thorn BE, Ward LC, Sullivan MJ, Boothby JL Communal coping model of catastrophizing: conceptual model building 2003; 106: 1-2Pain
  18. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. 1984; Stress, appraisals, and coping
  19. Keefe FJ, Crisson J, Urban BJ, Williams DA Analyzing chronic low back pain: the relative contribution of pain coping strategies 1990; 40: 293-301Pain
  20. Woby SR, Watson PJ, Roach NK, Urmston M Adjustment to chronic low back pain - the relative influence of fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control 2004; 42: 761-774Behav Res Ther
  21. Bandura A Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change 1977; 84: 191-215Psychol Rev
  22. Woby SR, Watson PJ, Roach NK, Urmston M Are changes in fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control predictive of changes in chronic low back pain and disability? 2004; 8: 201-210Euro J Pain
  23. Roland M, Morris R A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain 1983; 8: 141-144Spine
  24. Jensen MP, Strom SE, Turner JA, Romano JM Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland Scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients 1992; 50: 157-162Pain
  25. Roland M, Fairbank J The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire 2000; 25: 3115-3124Spine
  26. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods 1986; 27: 117-126Pain
  27. Ogon M, Krismer M, Sollner W, Kantner-Rumplmair W, Lampe A Chronic low back pain measurement with visual analogue scales in different settings 1996; 64: 425-428Pain
  28. Robinson ME, Riley JL, Myers CD, Sadler IJ, Kvaal SA, Geisser ME, et al The Coping Strategies Questionnaire: a large sample, item level factor analysis 1997; 13: 43-49Clin J Pain
  29. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2001; Using multivariate statistics. 4th edn
  30. Kaiser HF An index of factorial simplicity 1974; 39: 31-36Psychometrika
  31. Bartlett MS A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations 1954; 16: 296-298J Royal Stat Soc
  32. Myers R. 1990; Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd edn
  33. Menard S. 1995; Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage university paper series on quantative applications in the social sciences, 07-106
  34. Field A. 2000; Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows
  35. Cook RD, Weisberg S. 1982; Residuals and influence in regression
  36. Stevens JP. 1992; Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 2nd edn
  37. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? 1997; 72: 95-97Pain
  38. Cattell RB The scree test for the number of factors 1966; 1: 245-276Multivariate Behavioral Research
  39. Waddell G A new clinical model for the treatment of low back pain 1987; 12: 632-644Spine
  40. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art 2000; 85: 317-332Pain
  41. Williams ACdeC, Davies HT, Chadury Y Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings 2000; 85: 457-463Pain
  42. Burns JW, Kubilus A, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis 2003; 71: 81-91J Consult Clin Psychol
  43. Burns JW, Glenn B, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K Cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment: a replication and extension of a cross-lagged panel analysis 2003; 41: 1163-1182Behav Res Ther
  44. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Strom SE The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: development and preliminary validation 1995; 60: 203-216Pain